Skip to main content
Services · Intelligent document processing

Turn the document backlog into structured data your team can act on.

We build OCR-plus-LLM pipelines that extract typed fields from scanned forms, contracts, and operational paperwork — with schema validation, human review where it matters, and an evidence trail your auditor can read.

What you get

Three concrete deliverables.

First document type in 6 weeks

Document classification and extraction pipeline

Per-template parsers, schema-validated outputs, and confidence scoring so downstream systems consume clean, typed records.

Shipped with the pipeline

Human-in-the-loop review console

Reviewer queue, field-level confidence highlighting, side-by-side source-and-extraction view, and an audit trail of every correction.

Refreshed monthly

Evidence and audit package

Source document, extracted record, reviewer trail, and model version stamped on every output — examiner-ready in a single export.

How we work

From kickoff to production.

012 weeks

Document inventory and target schemas

Catalog the document types in scope, score them by volume and complexity, and agree on the typed schema each will produce.

022 weeks

Labeling and gold-set creation

Build a labeled gold set per document type with your reviewers. This is the eval bench every later change runs against.

035 weeks

Pipeline and review console build

Wire OCR, classification, extraction, validation, and the reviewer console. Confidence thresholds tuned on the gold set, not on vibes.

04Continuous

Production rollout and improvement

Roll out by document type behind a feature flag, monitor extraction accuracy and reviewer override rates, and retrain when the curve plateaus.

The stack we build on.

Cloud-agnostic. We meet you where your tenant lives.

Azure Document IntelligenceAWS TextractTesseractAzure OpenAIAnthropic ClaudePydantic / Zod schemasReviewer console (custom)Kubernetes

Outcome metrics

95%
Straight-through extraction

Median across deployed document types

12x
Throughput per reviewer

Versus pre-pipeline baseline

<3%
Reviewer override rate

Post-stabilization, gold-set tuned

From the field

One we shipped.

Regulated lender · loan operations

Replaced a manual document indexing team with an extraction pipeline plus a reviewer queue. Throughput up 12x, error rate cut in half, full audit trail on every loan file.

12x

Documents per reviewer

Vs. fully manual baseline

Read the case study

FAQ

Questions buyers ask first.

How do you handle documents the model has not seen before?
Two paths. New document types route to the reviewer queue with a 'novel template' flag and a labeling micro-flow; once we have a small gold set, we add a template-specific extractor. We never silently extract from a document type we have not benchmarked.
What about handwriting, stamps, and signature pages?
Handwriting goes through a separate OCR pass with a tuned confidence threshold; stamps and signatures are detected as bounding regions with a yes/no signal rather than text. We document what works and what does not on your specific corpus.
How do you measure extraction quality?
Per-field precision and recall against your labeled gold set, scored every time a model or prompt changes. We publish the scoreboard in your repo so quality regressions are loud.
Where do source documents live?
In your storage account or bucket, under your IAM. The pipeline pulls from your object store, writes the extracted record back, and never holds source documents in a third-party platform.
What evidence ships with each extracted record?
Source document hash, page-level OCR confidence, model and prompt version, reviewer ID if touched, and full diff history. Auditor-ready by default, not by special request.

Ready to scope this?

Thirty minutes with a principal. We will walk through your constraints and what a 30- to 90-day pilot would actually look like.